Showing posts with label 1971. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1971. Show all posts

Dec 22, 2023

বিজয়: ১৯৭১ বনাম ২০২৩

Photo: AFP

১৯৭১ সালের ১৬ই ডিসেম্বর বাংলার ইতিহাসের এক অবিস্মরণীয় দিন। নয় মাসের রক্তক্ষয়ী মুক্তিযুদ্ধ শেষে লাখো শহীদের রক্ত, লাখো মা-বোনের সম্ভ্রম, হাজারো স্বজনহারা পরিবারের আর্তনাদ এবং কোটি শরনার্থীর বাস্তুহারা হবার বেদনার মহাসাগর পেরিয়ে বিশ্বের বুকে বাংলাদেশ নামক একটি স্বাধীন এবং সার্বভৌম রাষ্ট্রের জন্ম হয় সেদিন। 

বাঙালি জাতির অবিসংবাদিত নেতা বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের অকুতোভয় সত্ত্বা যা ভেতো বাঙালিকে যোদ্ধা জাতিকে রুপান্তরিত করে পাকিস্তানি হানাদার বাহিনীর মতো উচ্চ প্রশিক্ষিত এবং আধুনিক সমরাস্ত্র সজ্জিত সেনাবাহিনীকে পরাস্ত করেছে, বিজয়ের দিন বাঙালির সেই “চির উন্নত মম শির” উদযাপ‌নের দিন। এই সোনালি দিন মুক্তিযুদ্ধকালীন প্রবাসী সরকারের প্রধানমন্ত্রী বঙ্গতাজ তাজউদ্দীন আহমেদের শত বিপত্তির মুখেও অটল বিশ্বাস, সুদক্ষ পরিচালনা এবং “জ্ব‌লে পুড়ে ছারখার তবু মাথা নোয়াবার নয়” সত্ত্বার প্রতি শ্রদ্ধাবনত হবার দিন। 

বিপুল ত্যাগ এবং অমূল‌্য রক্তের দামে কেনা এ স্বাধীনতা, আর তাই বিজয়ের দিনে পাঁচ দশকের বাংলাদেশের ইতিহাস এবং বর্তমানকে মূল্যায়ন করে ভাবার দিন -- পাকিস্তানি শোষণ এবং বঞ্চণা থেকে বিজয় অর্জন করেছি ১৯৭১ সালে, কিন্তু সত্যিকার অর্থে জাতি হিসেবে আমরা কি সামাজিক, অর্থনৈতিক, সাংস্কৃতিক এবং ধর্মীয়সহ সামগ্রিক মুক্তি অর্জন করতে সক্ষম হয়েছি? 

Jun 14, 2020

Home, homeland and aliens

Rohingya refugees arrive in Bangladesh from Rakhine state of Myanmar in 2017 (Photo: AFP)

Home is a place always close to our hearts, not only because we were born, grew up and belong there but also because home is where there is love and care.

Our homeland is an extended version of home, which in addition invokes our patriotism.

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and long lockdowns, we have been staying home not only because we love and care but mostly to save lives. But this long confinement at home has not been loving and caring for everyone as people are under pressure from loss of work and income, mental anguish and fear of death.

The troubles are even more dire for tens of thousands of internal and overseas migrant workers who returned home penniless and hopeless.

Despite this turmoil, people should remain calm and consider themselves luckier than the millions of poor souls around the world who are deprived of home and homeland.

There are nearly 70.8 million forcibly displaced people in the world, according to United Nations refugee agency UNHCR.

People are displaced by natural disasters and conflicts, and they are referred to by many names — refugees, stateless, internally displaced persons, asylum seekers, etc.

Maybe we should call them aliens, because they are alienated from what we all love — home and homeland.

Mar 26, 2018

দা‌য়িত্বশীল স্বাধীনতা





স্বাধীনতা মা‌নে স্ব অধীনতা বা নি‌জের অ‌ধিকার ও সিদ্ধান্ত গ্রহ‌ণের নিরংকুশ ক্ষমতা। কিন্তু ব্যাপক অ‌র্থে স্বাধীনতা হ‌লো নি‌জের অ‌ধিকার ভোগ করা ও অন্য‌কে তা ভোগ কর‌তে দেয়ার চা‌বিকা‌ঠি। অার স্বাধীনতার অপর পি‌ঠে র‌য়ে‌ছে দা‌য়িত্বশীলতা। বলা হ‌য়ে থা‌কে, অাপনার স্বাধীনতা ততটুকুই যতটুকু অাপ‌নি হাত ও পা ছুঁড়‌তে পা‌রেন। অাপ‌নি রাস্তায় দাঁ‌ড়ি‌য়ে ই‌চ্ছেম‌তো হাত ও পা ছুঁড়‌তে পা‌রেন, কেউ বাঁধা দেবে  না, কারণ এটা করার স্বাধীনতা বা অ‌ধিকার অাপনার র‌য়ে‌ছে। কিন্তু অাপনার হাত ও পা যেন অন্য‌কে অাঘাত না ক‌রে, কারণ সেটুকু অাপনার স্বাধীনতা এখ‌তিয়া‌রে প‌ড়ে না। স্বাধীনতা যেন স্বেচ্ছাচা‌রিতা না হ‌য়ে ও‌ঠে সেটা বজায় রাখার দা‌য়িত্ব সক‌লের, য‌দিও স্বাধীন বাংলা‌দে‌শে তার ন‌জির অামরা খুব একটা দেখ‌তে পাই না, কারণ স্বাধীনতা ও দা‌য়িত্বশীলতা অা‌জো অামা‌দের মজ্জাগত হয় নি অার স্বাধীনতা ও স্বেচ্ছাচ‌ারিতার পার্থক্য অামা‌দের মগ‌জে অল্পই ধারণ কর‌তে পে‌রে‌ছি। অামা‌দের পূর্বপুরু‌ষেরা এক‌টি স্বাধীন দেশ উপহার দি‌য়ে গে‌ছেন, বহু ত্যাগ ও ব‌লিদা‌নের বি‌নিম‌য়ে। স্বাধীনতা মূল্যবান সম্পদ, অার তাই স্বাধীনতা‌কে অপব্যবহার ক‌রে যা‌চ্ছেতাই ক‌রে বেড়া‌লে অামা‌দের পূর্বসুরী‌দের অপমান করা হয়। এজন্য ই‌তিহাস কোন‌দিন অামা‌দের ক্ষমা কর‌বে না। অার তাই এবা‌রের স্বাধীনতা দিব‌সে শপথ নেই-- স‌ত্যিকা‌রের স্বাধীন হ‌বো, অন্য‌কে স্বাধীন কর‌বো, নি‌জে দা‌য়িত্বশীলভা‌বে স্বাধীনতা ভোগ কর‌বো, ও অন্য‌কে তা ভোগ কর‌তে সহায়তা কর‌বো।

Dec 16, 2017

স্বাধীনতা: ১৯৭১ বনাম ২০১৯


স্বাধীন বাংলাদেশে আজও অধিকাংশ বাঙালি প্রকৃত মুক্তি ও স্বাধীনতার স্বাদ পায় নি। (Photo: Rock Ronald Rozario)
১৯৭১। বাঙালি জাতি এক স্বর্ণালু স্বপ্নে বিভোর হয়েছিল–পরাধীনতার বন্ধন থেকে মুক্ত হবার নেশায় । এ মুক্তিপাগল জাতিকে পশ্চিম পাকিস্তানি শাসকগোষ্ঠীর শোষণ ও বঞ্চনার অবসানে একটি  শোষণহীন, সাম্যবাদী, ধর্মনিরপেক্ষ, অসাম্প্রদায়িক, দুর্নীতিমুক্ত, ক্ষুধা-দারিদ্রহীন ও সর্বজনের মঙ্গল ও উন্নয়নে ব্রতী দেশ ও জাতি গঠনের সে স্বপ্নে সওয়ার করেছিলেন হাজার বছরের শ্রেষ্ঠ বাঙালি বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমান। সুখ-শান্তি-সাম্যের জয়োগান গেয়ে নয় মাসব্যাপী যুদ্ধে কত লাখো তাজা প্রাণ বুকের রক্ত ঢেলে দিয়েছে, কত না নারী সম্ভ্রম খুঁইয়েছে, কত কোটি মানুষ ভিটে-মাটি-সম্পদ হারিয়ে সর্বশান্ত হয়েছে। ১৯৪৭ সালের তথাকথিত ধর্মভিত্তিক জাতীয়তাবাদী উন্মাদনায় ভারত ভেঙ্গে পাকিস্তান রাষ্ট্রের জন্মের যে ঐতিহাসিক ভ্রান্তিবিলাস, তার প্রায়শ্চিত্ত বলির নামান্তর সে সংগ্রাম । আর স্বাধীনতা ও সার্বভৌমত্বের জন্য এই যে বিপুল আত্মদান, বিশ্ব ইতিহাসেই তা বিরল।


Dec 8, 2017

Why Bangladeshi elections are a time for violence against minorities

Hindus walk past a burned down house after a Muslim mob attack in northern Bangladesh in this file photo


A rally of 19 minority rights' groups in Bangladesh has condemned "ethnic cleansing" of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar.
The rally also called for protection of minorities in Bangladesh, particularly Buddhists, amid rising anger against Buddhist-majority Myanmar.   
The mass gathering was held in the capital, Dhaka, on Sept. 14.
By some estimates, more than 400,000 Rohingya have fled Myanmar's Rakhine State as refugees since a new round of ethnic violence flared in late August.
Islamic radicals have reportedly threatened to avenge persecution of Rohingya, prompting the Bangladesh government to beef-up security in the Buddhist-majority areas of Cox's Bazar and Chittagong.


Aug 22, 2017

Bangladesh's existential threat






Until a few years ago, people in Bangladesh used to exhale a sigh of relief whenever there were tragic events of violent extremism in Pakistan or Afghanistan.
They took pride in defining themselves against a country they considered full of religious bigots responsible for carrying out bloody attacks on minorities and brave citizens who oppose extremism.
They felt satisfied that their forefathers had parted ways with Pakistan to make way for an independent Bangladesh through the 1971 war.
In recent times, this sense of relief, pride and satisfaction has been fading fast with a gradual rise of religious intolerance and extremism in the country.
Since 2013, Bangladesh has seen seven secular bloggers, writers and publishers brutally murdered, allegedly by Islamist militants, including four bloggers and one publisher this year alone. Only one blogger narrowly escaped death. Their writings and publications were critical of religion and the political use of religion, especially Islam.
By the time Bangladesh was reeling from the killings of an Italian aid worker and a Japanese man in September and October, alleged jihadists bombed a Shiite festival in Dhaka, killing two and injuring dozens on Oct. 24.




In the latest episode, two groups of attackers entered two publishing houses in Dhaka and hacked two publishers and two writers with machetes and cleavers on Oct. 31. Faisal Arefin Dipan, owner of Jagriti Prokashony, died of his wounds inside the locked office, while Ahmedur Rashid Tutul, owner of Suddhaswar, and his two writer friends were critically wounded.
Dipan and Tutul had earlier printed books by U.S.-based Bangladeshi blogger and science writer Avijit Roy, hacked to death on the streets of Dhaka in February, allegedly by militants.
In March 2014, a popular Bangladesh online bookstore had stopped selling Roy's books after a local Islamist extremist issued death threats to its owner.
Ansarullah Bangla Team, a banned local militant outfit, presumably linked to al-Qaida on the Indian subcontinent, claimed responsibility for attacks on bloggers and publishers. The Islamic State jihadist group has taken credit for the killings of the two foreigners and for bombing the Shia festival.
In September, Ansarullah Bangla Team published a hit list of 20 Bangladeshi bloggers based in the United States and Europe. Some of these bloggers have dual citizenship; some of them fled the country during the past two years after death threats.
Fearing extremist attacks, several prominent writers and bloggers have already withdrawn from critical writings; many have taken measures to ensure security in their public life.
 A grave threat
The persecution of freethinkers in Bangladesh is not without precedence.
In 1994, radical Islamists issued death threats to Taslima Nasrin, a prominent female writer, for her writings on feminism and criticism of religion. She has been living in exile ever since. 
In 2004, Humayun Azad, a renowned linguist and author, escaped a brutal assassination attempt in Dhaka, after he wrote a political satire that criticizes the political use of Islam. Azad later died in his sleep during a trip to Germany, largely due to trauma over the attack.
In 2013, Hefazat-e-Islam, a radical Islamic group, published a list of 84 secular bloggers and marched in Dhaka demanding the execution of atheist bloggers and the installation of a blasphemy law. The group is allegedly linked to country's largest radical Islamic party Jamaat-e-Islami, whose entire leadership is being prosecuted for war crimes during Bangladesh's liberation war.
Jamaat opposed Bangladesh's independence. It stands accused of helping the Pakistan army in the torture and massacre of pro-independence people, including some 200 Bengali intellectuals during the war.
Many believe that Jamaat has sponsored Hefazat-e-Islam to hunt the bloggers, who were at the forefront of organizing a massive rally called the "Shahbag movement" for the trial and execution of all war criminals.
Whether the attackers of freethinkers have their base in international jihadist groups like al-Qaida or the Islamic State, or in local Islamic political parties, they pose a grave threat to Bangladesh's existence.
Recently, there has been a growing dispute between Western intelligence services and Bangladesh's government over who is responsible for the recent spate of attacks. Foreign intelligence services claim they have passed credible information to the government on the activities of the Islamic State jihadist group. But the government has repeatedly refused the claim and stressed that the attacks came from within — from extremists allied with opposition political parties.
Frustratingly, the government has failed to prove opposition links to extremist violence and refused to consider alternative explanations linking international terror groups.
Most apathetically, the home minister called the recent attacks "isolated incidents" that could happen anywhere in the world. Earlier, the police chief admonished bloggers for their writings and warned them not to "cross the line."
Emboldening extremism
Ironically, the deceased freethinkers have been largely supportive of the so-called secular ruling Awami League government that led the country during the independence struggles.
The government has failed to conduct a proper probe, and to deliver justice for bloggers, which ultimately emboldens the extremists. Moreover, it has refrained from taking the side of bloggers publicly, and didn't do enough to protect them.
Freethinkers are the architects of a nation; they are revered and loved for their contributions. Sadly, a nation that was born with the guiding light of freethinkers, through the independence war in 1971, is collectively failing to protect them from the onslaught of persecution. Everyone including the government, civil society and common people must take blame for this failure.
Apart from an end to socioeconomic oppression, Bangladesh's independence was a victory for a moderate form of Islam practiced by the majority of Muslims in this part of the world.
The country's founding fathers inserted secularism and freedom of thought as key principles of the constitution, in order to make Bangladesh a true democracy with respect for a multitude of religions, ethnicities and differences of opinion. Due to the bitter experience with Pakistan, the country's founders banned religion-based politics, constitutionally.
The march toward a secular, democratic society was halted with the assassination of the country's founding leader, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, in a 1975 military coup and the subsequent military rule of the next 15 years, which led to a revival of Islamic parties and religion-based politics.
Democracy was restored in the early 1990s, but the influence of Islamists continued, which ultimately gave birth to several homegrown militant outfits since 2000 that were responsible for attacking anything they deemed un-Islamic.
The government has struggled to contain these jihadists, who aim to make Bangladesh an Islamic state.
As the attacks on freethinkers continue, a climate of fear and insecurity has gripped people. They now question whether they are still the proud citizens of a country that has a long history of tolerance and religious harmony. They wonder if the country is still committed to its founding principles of secularism and freedom of thought.
Despite being a Muslim-majority country, a strong sense of nationalism based on culture, rational thinking, religious and ethnic diversity has been a core value of Bangladesh.
The extremists are out on the streets to wipe out rationalist freethinkers in order to pave the way for an Islamic state. If the government fails to stop this rising tide of intolerance and extremism, a similar fate could await Bangladesh as what is being seen in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Middle East countries.
No doubt, Bangladesh is at an identity crisis. As freethinkers bemoan the loss of their space in society and the pen's diminished power amid the preying of machete-wielding extremists, a disaster is looming for Bangladesh.
If Bangladesh fails to protect freethinkers from intolerance and extremists, the nation will be devoured from within by radicals, and ultimately fall apart.
END

In Bangladesh, murders of atheist bloggers show dangers of apathy








Hundreds of students and secular activists this week peacefully marched in Sylhet, a city in northeastern Bangladesh. They gathered to mourn and to protest the heinous killing of atheist blogger and writer Ananta Bijoy Das, allegedly by machete-wielding Islamic militants.
The protesters demanded justice for the killing and criticized the Awami League government for failing to protect free thinkers like Das from the fury of religious fanatics. They also condemned a culture of impunity amid a string of attacks on secular writers and bloggers in the country in recent years. “The government must crush this evil force now,” some chanted during the protest, “or this evil force will crush Bangladesh one day.”
But sadly, Das’ death is unlikely to cause any ripple effect in the waters of this nation’s 160 million people, despite garnering massive international media coverage.
For more than a decade, a war of words between secularists and Islamists has been a common topic on the country’s social media and blogosphere. And now the fanatics are vigorously carrying out their agenda by taking the war onto the streets.
Das, 33, was a banker, editor and blogger who promoted scientific ideas and rationalism through his writing. He became the third recent victim in what has been a one-sided war: Avijit Roy, a US-based Bangladeshi writer and blogger was murdered in February, while blogger Washiqur Rahman was killed a month later.
Now, more than four decades after gaining independence from Pakistan in 1971, Bangladesh is once again at a crossroads.
The nation’s victory during the war defined Bangladesh as a secular, democratic nation. But the cold-blooded killings of the bloggers in broad daylight show the ghosts of the past are back from the shadows.
It remains to be seen whether or not the perpetrators of these killings have been supported by Islamist parties or more radical groups. But it is clear they have an agenda: to wipe our rationalists and secularists.
No doubt their bases are strong. But there is an even greater force that helps them to thrive: a serious lack of sympathy and action from the public, civil society and the ruling and opposition parties amid growing religious intolerance.
“This was well-planned, choreographed — a global act of terrorism. But what almost bothers me more is that no one from the Bangladesh government has reached out to me,” Rafida Ahmed Bonya, widow of slain blogger Roy, told Reuters in a recent interview, criticizing the Bangladesh government for not responding more aggressively to her husband’s killing.
“It’s as if I don’t exist, and they are afraid of the extremists. Is Bangladesh going to be the next Pakistan or Afghanistan?”
In response, Sajeeb Wazed, the son of Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and an informal advisor to the ruling party, said his mother offered personal condolences to Roy's father. But his explanation of what he believes to be Bangladesh’s volatile political situation is telling.
“We are walking a fine line here. We don’t want to be seen as atheists. It doesn’t change our core beliefs. We believe in secularism,” he said. “But given that our opposition party plays that religion card against us relentlessly, we can’t come out strongly for him. It’s about perception, not about reality.”
Although police made arrests after the attacks, there is still a lack of genuine interest in punishing the killers, leaving the cases in limbo. There is also no clear-cut political commitment to tackle the rise of Islamic militancy.
The ruling Awami League, in power since 2008, led the nation during the independence struggle and calls itself a secular, center-left party. But it has done little to crack down on Islamists and punish those who attack bloggers. The party has refrained from publicly condemning the attacks on the bloggers and has done almost nothing to protect them.
In fear of losing votes during the last election, the government went on to appease Islamists by arresting several bloggers and erasing hundreds of blog posts.
The center-right Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), the second largest party, has maintained an utter silence on the matter, fearing backlash from longtime ally Jamaat-e-Islami, the country’s largest radical Islamist party.
In fact, BNP has a record of siding with Islamists since the founding of the party by military dictator Ziaur Rahman in 1978. After swarming into power in 1977, Ziaur Rahman allowed religion-based politics and Islamic parties that had been banned after the independence war. He amended the original constitution of 1972 and added “absolute trust and faith in Almighty Allah”, replacing the socialist religious-free commitment to “secularism” as one of the four key principles, in order to make the country more Islamic.
In the preamble of the constitution he asserted the Islamic phrase “Bismillahir-Rahmaanir-Rahim"("In the name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Merciful"). Power has altered between Awami League and BNP since the return to parliamentary democracy in the 1990s, but none of the parties dared to make the constitution truly secular and democratic. After a Supreme Court verdict in 2010 in favor of secular principles, the Awami League reasserted ‘secularism’ in the constitution, but didn’t change Bismillahir-Rahmaanir-Rahim or touch Islam as the state religion.
From 2001 to 2006, the BNP-Jamaat alliance ruled the country and their five-year rule saw a massive rise in Islamic militancy. Militant outfits carried out a series of bomb attacks on cultural programs, political rallies and courts deemed un-Islamic. At the height of the attacks, a militant group detonated some 500 bombs in 63 of the 64 districts of Bangladesh on August 17, 2005. At the time, many feared the country was plunging into a civil war like that waged by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Amid a media outcry and international pressure, the government banned two militant groups — Harkat-ul-Jihad and Jamaat-ul-Mujahedin Bangladesh — and arrested and executed their top leaders. Although many members of these groups went into hiding, recent media reports suggest they are regrouping under different banners and recruiting university students. Ansarullah Bangla Team, one of those regrouped militant outfits, claimed responsibility for blogger Washiqur Rahman’s murder.
Experts say these groups are thriving amid the recent feuds and political violence between the Awami League and BNP. As the government and opposition keep busy hunting each other, fanatics are advancing their own agendas.
Nobody is doing enough to resist the rising tide of religious fundamentalism. The government is apathetic, civil society is indifferent, and the masses are simply silent.
History shows us that letting religious fanaticism thrive is dangerous and disastrous in the long run. The war waged by the Islamic State in the Middle East, or the Taliban in Pakistan and Afghanistan didn’t happen in a day.
Bangladesh used to be called one of the most moderate Muslim countries in the world, but that is no more.
When the nation as a whole feels no urge to act when a writer is killed in broad daylight, it is a troubling sign indeed.
Unless there is a change of mind in all quarters of the nation on the issue, there is no doubt that evil forces will one day swallow and control Bangladesh.
Bangladesh needs to rise to the challenge before it’s too late.
END
Click for the original piece here 

Dec 9, 2013

Seeking justice from a flawed war crimes court


Many people in the country rejoiced this week as one of two special courts prosecuting alleged war criminals convicted a former leader of the largest Islamist party and sentenced him to death.
Abul Kalam Azad, a former member of Jamaat-e-Islami, was found guilty on seven of eight charges against him, including murder, rape, looting and arson, and sentenced in absentia.
The Islamic cleric who used to appear regularly on state-run and private television channels, is thought to have fled to Pakistan when the war crimes tribunal announced charges against him in April last year.
The tribunal’s verdict on Azad, announced January 21, was widely hailed in local media and celebrated by people across the country.
Such joy over the prospect of a death by hanging is understandable in part because many in the country have waited decades to receive justice for atrocities committed during Bangladesh’s War of Liberation from Pakistan in 1971.
The conflict saw the deaths of an estimated three million people, the rape of about 200,000 women, widespread looting and arson attacks, and the displacement of nearly 10 million people to neighboring India, according to government data.
Atrocities committed by military forces on civilian populations were widespread because they were helped by local collaborators – particularly, by members of Jamaat-e-Islami, which opposed secession and saw independence and separation from Pakistan as an implicit attack on Islam.
Those tensions began with the partition of India in 1947 and have persisted ever since, causing political and economic turmoil that continues to plague Bangladeshi society and inflame religious conflict.
But the justice celebrated this week in Bangladesh is something of a mixed bag.
Since its creation three years ago, the tribunal has been criticized by rights groups for not meeting international legal standards and concerning itself with retribution rather than justice.
To date, nine party leaders from Jamaat-e-Islami and two from the main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party have been charged with war crimes, but both parties have dismissed the proceedings as unjust and politically motivated.
The nation’s ruling Awami League (AL), which led the push for independence, has made the war crimes tribunal a centerpiece of its administration.
But the AL has played more on public emotions rather than the strict demands of justice in a nation struggling to follow through on the promises that shaped its drive for independence.
Amid the outpouring of joy over this week’s verdict, one might be tempted to see progress towards a post-extremist and more democratic society, as well as a vindication of the AL’s administration under the leadership of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina.
That would be a mistake. Much of the support for the tribunal has been linked to the tragedies of the war years that left few families untouched. Moreover, many have also seen the trials as an effort to put an end to the religious extremism that was for so long promoted by parties such as Jamaat-e-Islami.
But as continued dissention in the country over the tribunal shows, rooting out extremism is more easily hoped for than accomplished. And it is unlikely to proceed primarily from a flawed tribunal.
Until pluralism and tolerance are embraced by all members of society, Bangladesh will continue to struggle with political and sectarian conflict.

The Third Eye is the pseudonym of a journalist and commentator based in Dhaka
Read the original post here- Seeking justice from a flawed war crimes court

Dec 30, 2011

Victory but no freedom for Bangladesh

A child wears a headband of Bangladesh National Flag during victory day celebrations in Dhaka. File Photo: www.technewssource.com) 

People in Bangladesh celebrated their 40th Victory Day last Friday. It’s a red letter day in the history of Bengali people who snatched independence from West Pakistan in 1971.


The misery people went through is little known to the world, even to many in South Asian countries. There has been little effort to let the world know what actually happened in 1971.

The war began with one of the worst genocides in the history of mankind. The West Pakistan army killed three million people and ravaged more than 300,000 women in a matter of weeks and at least 10 million people took shelter in India.

The Bengali people are not by nature warriors, but they couldn’t help turning into a brave nation amid that massacre. After nine months bloody struggle they defeated the army to claim victory.

The independence of Bangladesh was, in a sense, a global war with the USA and China assisting Pakistan and Bangladesh getting support from India and Russia. It was also a war between moderate and extreme forces in Islam. This time the moderate force was victorious.

Yet after 40 years, we still have not achieved freedom.

The disparity between rich and poor has not changed. A few rich and influential people enjoy all the amenities of life while 80 percent languish in poverty.

Politics are entirely election-oriented and political leaders see it as nothing more than a rich vein to be mined. They have no hesitation in colluding with their former enemies if it suits them.

The war we fought and won was against a vulture who tried to grab our heart. There are many more evils to defeat and many more wars to win. One day the people will rise, throw away all injustice and freedom will be ours, truly.

View original post @ Give Us This Day

Mar 26, 2010

Independence: 1971 & 2010

National Martyrs' Memorial in Savar, Dhaka is dedicated to unidentified martyrs of Liberation War 1971

Bangladesh, a country named after the mother tongue of her people emerged into world map in 1971. Through a bloody battle for nine months, offering a priceless sacrifice of 3 million souls and respect of 200,000 women and enormous loss of properties people of the country gained freedom from malicious Pakistani rulers. The long-cherished dream to be truly independent rose high up that was nurtured over the centuries since 1757 when British colonialism began in this sub-continent. The valiant people of Bangladesh probably offered the largest sacrifice for their freedom in the history of mankind.

Today is the Independence Day of Bangladesh. In 1971 Bangladesh was declared independent by Bangabadhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the elected leader of majority Awami League party in East Pakistan then. He proclaimed the 'Declaration of Independence' at early hours of  26 March, 1971 before he was arrested by invader Pak army. His enormous efforts to meet his people's plea for freedom from all kinds of suppression politically was unable to meltdown stiff hearts of the rulers. Instead, those butchers intended to stop the plea of people with bullets. Pak army began heinous 'Operation Searchlight' to hunt down unarmed Bengali people in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) on 25 March night. They called this operation 'rebel hunt' who were trying to split 'Pakistan' with support from India, their arch-enemy for all times. It was nothing but a huge 'genocide'. Millions of people fled to India to save their lives, millions were killed and tens of thousands of women were ravaged. However, they eventually finished as defeated party in December 16, 1971 in front of heroics of Bengali freedom fighters and then to joint forces.

The history of Bangladesh is found all over in pages of world history. I read them numerous times in my student life and still now read them. My father was a school boy when the liberation war started, so there is no scope for me to rewind and go back to those days because I had no existence then! What I understand from historical references is people in 1971 wanted to be free from foreign invasions and suppression. They wanted to gain sovereignty, to live and let live independently in a happy abode for their own. They snatched that off from Pak rulers with long struggles and heroics. They got freedom in December 16, 1971. But I dare to say that people of this country are not yet truly independent.

What is independence? From my knowledge in civics I understand it's the way how people enjoy their rights freely without making harms to other people's rights. Independence is to ensure that all people irrespective of caste, religion and socio-economic conditions are lawfully equal and eligible to enjoy their rights and fulfill their duties.

In 1971, outer enemy was defeated and we became free. But we are yet to be free from inner enemies, many political and social vices. They still dominate the country influentially, giving birth to thousands of problems, making people's life a hell. This is a constant challenge for everyone of this country to be trully independent one day. There is along way to go............................lots of things to be done, lots of time required to build a real 'Bengal of Gold' whom we would love with our lives.

দক্ষিণ এশিয়ায় ভোটের রাজনীতি এবং খ্রিস্টান সম্প্রদায়

Bangladeshi Christians who account for less than half percent of some 165 million inhabitants in the country pray during an Easter Mass in D...