 |
| India's border guards have killed hundreds of people along Indo-Bangla border in the past decades |
All
living things will die some day. In fact, every day about 150,000 people die
around the world because of illness, accident and, increasingly, from war, acts
of terror and ethnic or religious conflicts.
In Bangladesh, a growing number have died in the last decade for the most
trivial of reasons – gunned down by Indian border guards for allegedly
trespassing on Indian territory along a 4,100 km border
About 1,000 people have been killed in the last 10 years at the
hands of India’s Border Security Force (BSF). Most have been unarmed
Bangladeshi villagers as India maintains a ‘shoot-to-kill’
policy.
India
and Bangladesh share a common history,
and Bangladesh is India’s largest trade
partner. The popular culture of India has been enthusiastically embraced across
the border. And yet, border guards shoot first and ask questions later.
Ironic, then, that Indian media has claimed that Bangladesh was found to be the most trusted nation in a
recent online survey, with Russia a close second.
If this
is the case, then why does the BSF kill so many people along the Bangladesh border? Or to put it another way, if the survey truly reflects
the mindset of Indian citizens about Bangladesh, then
is there not a disconnect among India’s politicians and government officials?
India
has every right to prevent illegal immigration, smuggling and anti-government
militant activities, but that right does not extend to the indiscriminate
slaughter of innocents. There is no justification for a shoot first policy.
The
killings went largely unabated and with no formal investigations or punishment
– despite high-level talks between the two countries and promises to end the
policy – until the death of a teenage Bangladeshi girl more than two years ago.
Felani
Khatun, 15, was returning home from a visit to India with her father on January
7, 2011. Neither had travel documents, so they opted to use a bamboo ladder to
scale the barbed wire fence installed by the BSF to protect the border.
Felani’s
father made it safely across the fence, but his young daughter’s clothes got
snagged on the fence and a BSF guard shot her dead.
Her
lifeless body hung on the fence for hours, later becoming a symbol for
Bangladeshis of the ongoing injustice of the border policy. It prompted an
unprecedented global outcry.
In the
years that followed, the number of such killings dropped while diplomatic and
international pressure increased. And last month, after massive criticism at
home and abroad, a trial was started to prosecute the border guard who killed
Felani.
Bangladeshis
had high hopes for justice, at least in one case among hundreds of others, from
the world’s largest democracy. But their hopes were short lived.
A
special court in West Bengal last Friday acquitted Amiya Ghosh, the man who
killed Felani Khatun.
Outraged
Bangladeshis believed that the trial held symbolic value and that if justice
was done, then BSF guards would think carefully before they fired on unarmed
civilians along the border.
India’s
High Commissioner to Bangladesh has
said the verdict is not final, but few have any faith that Felani’s killer will
ever be brought to justice.
As a
much larger, more prosperous neighbor, India must behave more responsibly with
its smaller and less powerful neighbors. Moreover, it should set an example in
the way it delivers justice, and its future as a superpower is not only
contingent upon resolving its disputes with arch-rival Pakistan, but on its
relations with all of its neighbors.
It’s
worth remembering what Alfred Lord Tennyson once wrote: “No man ever got very
high by pulling other people down.”
Third World View is the pseudonym for a Bangladeshi journalist
based in Dhaka
